[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
cgrundemann at gmail.com
Wed Dec 29 17:59:33 EST 2010
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:10, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> A somewhat long and very painful transition is, at this point, inevitable.
> As I have said, we're too far up the canyon. There is no room to turn
> the plane. Our remaining choices are to make the best landing we can
> relatively straight ahead, or, attempt a radical maneuver which will
> end in one of the following ways:
> 1. Plane strikes cliff with a direction of travel perpendicular to
> the cliff wall. (small impact site, wreckage relatively contained)
> 2. Plane stalls and hits bottom of canyon in near vertical attitude
> (small impact site at bottom of canyon, wreckage relatively
> 3. Plane strikes canyon in a wing-low attitude closer to
> parallel to the canyon wall, likely cartwheeling and
> breaking up on impact. (wreckage widely scattered,
> large impact zone)
> While none of these are good options and the desire to make a
> radical maneuver becomes nearly unavoidable reflex as the canyon
> wall approaches, landing straight ahead offers the highest
> survival rate.
> We are about a year past the point for making any such radical
> turn with any hope of success.
I think that when you are faced with hitting a wall, you're best
option is actually to bail out. In this case jumping out of the
crashing plane will allow us to parachute to/with IPv6. So I for one
am not trying to stop or turn the plane (we can't), rather I would
like to give the remaining provisions to those on board with
parachutes - and thus the best chance of surviving the impact.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML