[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 124: Clarification of Section 4.2.4.4

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Fri Dec 10 09:53:08 EST 2010


I oppose this proposal. It departs from good stewardship of the address space.

Owen

On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 12/10/10 1:08 AM, "Scott Leibrand" <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty at akamai.com> wrote:
> [ clip ]
> 
> 
> 
>> However, I expect 8.3 transfers to be the only practical way to
>> get space for a lot more than 3 months, so I think it's reasonable to
>> leave that window at something longer.
> 
> There are strategies emerging via multiple sources that address this problem
> head-on. You don't need the STLS to guarantee your need, you only need it to
> legitimize your use per current ARIN policy. It will be cheaper to only push
> exactly what you need through the STLS and on quarterly boundaries to
> maximize expense control. You can guarantee your price outside of STLS.
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> -M<
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.




More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list