[arin-ppml] Props. 122 + 123 process?
bill at herrin.us
Thu Dec 2 00:13:57 EST 2010
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:10 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> I'm fine with crickets on PPML when we are following the normal policy
> process, but you are suggesting this policy should follow the emergency
> policy process. In that case I don't think crickets on PPML is a good thing.
For what it's worth, my opinion is that 122 and 123 should be adopted
as draft policies and put through the normal process, at least until
the last /8 is actually allocated. However, the AC should plan to meet
within 48 hours of that allocation to determine whether to recommend
that the board adopt them under emergency rules and I would hope the
board would arrange to be able to quickly respond as well.
Yeah, we'll end up having to make a decision before the next meeting,
but there's no real harm in continuing the discussion until the last
minute as long as we have a pretty good idea what we're going to do
when it gets here.
When the last minute arrives, I would favor 122 and 123 as emergency policies.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML