[arin-ppml] IPv6 /32 minimum for extra-small ISP
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
Mon Apr 26 10:04:44 EDT 2010
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Gary Giesen <ggiesen at akn.ca> wrote:
> On 10-04-26 2:13 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> It's a line item in the overhead budget. The budget requested is
>> larger than the budget approved.
> An IPv6 /32 also doesn't cost anything if you have a /20 or larger v4
> allocation. If you have an X-Small (smaller than /20), it's only an extra
> $1250/year. Pretty small potatoes. By the time you *need* IPv6, it will just
> be the cost of doing business, and will be pretty easy to justify it (pretty
> hard to be an ISP without it).
By the time I need IPv6, you need me to have finished my IPv6
deployment ages ago so that you can stop paying the premium for IPv4.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list