[arin-ppml] The role of NAT in IPv6

[Chris Engel]

Gary T. Giesen wrote:

> As Owen has pointed out many times, the cost of supporting
> NAT is rarely borne by the person implementing it. It's borne
> by everyone else trying to sell services to the the NAT'd customer.

So let me get this straight, you're complaining that your customers demand support for X functionality (NAT or fill in whatever blank you want) in the services that you are trying to sell them and then assert how unfair it is that you have to carry the costs of meeting your own (potential) customers demand?

Let me introduce you to this concept called a "free market economy".



Christopher Engel