[arin-ppml] IPv4 Depletion as an ARIN policy concern

[Joe Maimon]

Paul G. Timmins wrote:
>
> Taking this to its logical conclusion, it's not necessary for community
> consensus to implement NAT66. If people demand it, and equipment vendors
> want to implement it, they will, and then will standardize it after the
> fact, much like many other current standards have been done.
>
> The fact that no such standard exists and no platform I'm aware of
> implements NAT66 is pretty telling in and of itself.
>
> -Paul
>
>
>   
What is proper is to stop demanding that everyone not want to use it.

Furthermore, at this similar state in IPv4 global deployment, NAT44 
wasnt really available either, and instead people were using other 
horrible workarounds.