[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 103: Change IPv6 Allocation Process

[Seth Mattinen]

michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>> Can you point me 
>> in the right direction for what it would take to get a hold 
>> of an archive of IPv4 registration data for the purpose of 
>> simulating the action of proposal
>> 103 versus the existing IPv6 policy?
> 
> How is a simulation of IPv4 registrations going to illuminate
> a change to the IPv6 policy.
> 
> This proposal is just a bad idea in so many ways.
> It is too complex to understand all the implications.
> It is too radical.
> It would disrupt IPv6 deployment while people scramble
> to figure out what it all means.
> It is not needed.
> It is out of sync with the rest of the world.
> It is wasting our time just discussing this non-starter.
> Please take this off the AC's agenda so that they can focus
> on more important issues like IPv4 runout.
> 

Applying IPv4 style utilization to IPv6 is also a bad idea, but yet it's
policy.

~Seth