[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

[David Farmer]

On 29 May 2009 Owen DeLong wrote:

> 
> On May 29, 2009, at 9:45 AM, David Farmer wrote:
> 
> > Additionally, I believe it may remove the need for for proposal 84. 
> > IPv6 Multiple Discrete Networks.  What to those that support that
> > proposal think?
> >
> I don't think it will.  I can see several scenarios where you would
> want your HD ration calculated independently for independent sites vs.
> a conjoint determination.
> Owen

Ok after reading proposal #84 again, I think I agree that at 
least some of the use cases for that proposal would not get 
much help from this.

However, I might want to add criteria to proposal #84 that a 
justification of why multiple sub parts of a larger aggregate are 
not suitable for the organization's purpose.  Because at least 
some of the potential use cases for #84 could be served my 
not requiring the announcement of the aggregate.  And in 
those cases I would rather such needs be meet by not 
announcing an aggregate.




===============================================
David Farmer                                      Email:farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
Networking & Telecomunication Services
University of Minnesota		       Phone: 612-626-0815
2218 University Ave SE		       Cell: 612-812-9952
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029	       FAX: 612-626-1818
===============================================