[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Fri May 29 12:51:23 EDT 2009

Hi Stacy,

Thanks for the credit :-)

I guess is important to realize that, unless I¹m wrong, right now this
requirement (200 networks), is no longer there in the rest of the RIRs, at
least I tried my best to get it removed !

Regards,
Jordi

From: Stacy Hughes <ipgoddess.arin at gmail.com>
Reply-To: <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:25:08 -0700
To: Member Services <info at arin.net>
Cc: <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Hello Everyone,
Before we really get started on this policy proposal, I must give credit
where credit is due.
Jordi Palet Martinez brought this topic to the table 3 years ago, and it got
shot down.  I myself, in my small IPv4-centric mind, thought it impossible
that an IPv6 only organization could exist.  Operations and innovation have
shown me the error of our thinking.
To quote myself from a different list:
IPv6 is a new paradigm we are supposed to be doing our best to encourage.
 As it stands, those community guys can't get it, the Caribbean guys can't
get it, and basically anyone trying to do anything vanguard can't get it
either.  (I hear the ULA objections here, even when they're nascent). 

We can be afraid of what IPv6 might do to the routing table, or we can
embrace what IPv6 can and will do for the Internet.
I choose the latter and support this proposal.
Stacy 

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Member Services <info at arin.net> wrote:
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with Policy Development
> Process.
> 
> This proposal is in the first stage of the Policy Development Process.
> ARIN staff will perform the Clarity and Understanding step. Staff does
> not evaluate the proposal at this time, their goal is to make sure that
> they understand the proposal and believe the community will as well.
> Staff will report their results to the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) within
> 10 days.
> 
> The AC will review the proposal at their next regularly scheduled
> meeting (if the period before the next regularly scheduled meeting is
> less than 10 days, then the period may be extended to the subsequent
> regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how to utilize the
> proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
> 
> In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on
> the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
> 
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
> 
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at:https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> 
> 
> ## * ##
> 
> 
> Policy Proposal Name: Open Access To IPv6
> 
> Proposal Originator: Stacy Hughes and Cathy Aronson
> 
> Proposal Version: 1.0
> 
> Date: 29 May 2009
> 
> Proposal type: modify
> 
> Policy term: permanent
> 
> Policy statement:
> 
> 1) Remove ³by advertising that connectivity through its single
> aggregated address allocation² from article 3 of section 6.5.1.1
> 
> 2) Remove article 4 of section 6.5.1.1, ³be an existing, known ISP in
> the ARIN region or have a plan for making at least 200 end-site
> assignments to other organizations within 5 years² in its entirety.
> 
> Rationale: It is acknowledged that these concepts have been put before
> the community in the past. However, with the wisdom of actual
> operational experience, the necessity of promoting IPv6 adoption
> throughout our region, and emerging native v6 only network models, it
> becomes obvious that these modifications to the NRPM are necessary.
> Removing the 200 end site requirement enables smaller, but no less
> important and viable, networks access to IPv6. Removing the Œknown ISP¹
> requirement enfranchises new, native v6 businesses that can drive
> innovation and expansion in the Internet industry, as well as other
> industries. Removing the requirement for a single aggregate announcement
> benefits the NRPM itself, as it has been decided by the community that
> it should not contain routing advice.
> 
> Timetable for implementation: immediately upon BoT ratification
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.