[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy - Revised andforwarded to the Board
Dave Feuer
dave at connetrix.com
Wed May 6 11:49:50 EDT 2009
Looking back on some old IP assignments that were allocated to us and others
I have dealt with by providers over the years I can say that there are a lot
of old blocks not being reallocated to other customers. Some of these have
not been active in over 6 years. And this is not for just a /29 or
something. We are talking multiple /24 and better.
-Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Kevin Kargel
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:07 AM
To: arin ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy - Revised
andforwarded to the Board
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm at ipinc.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 6:31 PM
> To: Kevin Kargel; matthew at matthew.at
> Cc: 'arin ppml'
> Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy -
> Revised andforwarded to the Board
>
>
{much freely done snipping}
>
> I am just leery of people saying that such-and-such is happening right
> now and offering no proof that it's actually happening.
>
> Ted
I believe the proof of what I am talking about is all of the unused IPv4
space that is not being returned so that it can be held as a speculative
commodity. Inaction in itself is a proof.
I must say I feel better now. For a while there Ted and I were agreeing on
most issues. It had me concerned. (Light hearted levity Ted, don't take it
serious ;) )
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list