[arin-ppml] Effect of ARIN's Letters

Fri May 1 17:46:06 EDT 2009

I have discussed IPv6 with people from most big ISPs, including telcos, and essentially all of them are planning for IPv6.  None of them believes that their IPv4 size will sustain them through the depletion of unassigned IPv4..  Admittedly, some are not as far along as they'd like, either in planning or in capital spending.

I don't understand what ASN database you mean, and I don't know how ARIN and ICANN could effect a sunset.  Could you suggest details?

What problems do you see with BGP with IPv6?   It might be appropriate to raise them at the IRTF's Routing Research Group, or in one of the IETF's Routing Area WGs.  (Internet search to find them)

What do you want ARIN to "open back up"?  Do you think the requirements for an IPv6 allocation or 32-bit ASN are too strict?  What would you propose?

Lee

________________________________
From: "Davey, George" <george at dmu.edu>
To: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net>
Cc: "ppml at arin.net" <ppml at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 1:44:45 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Effect of ARIN's Letters

The interesting thing is that the big ISPs do not want IPV6
because once the IPV4 addresses run out, they have a monopoly and they love monopolies.
The telcos are expressing this desire by their apparent
reluctance to IPV6.
There is also the expense factor and the non-desire of customers
to care about IPV anything.  They just want web pages to come up and IPV6
inhibits not helps.
The thing for ARIN and ICANN need to do is to set a sunset date
by which IPV4 IPs are obsolete and by which the ASN database for them will be
purged..
Problem is there is no ASN to replace them and that is the flaw
in the IPV6 implementational logic.
IPv4 will persist until such time.
Hopefully they can come up with BGP6 for IPV6 that will host
millions of ISPs not just 65,535, and set a sunset date for BGP4 and the
current ASN numbers associated with them.
This will force a “Gold Rush” and if ARIN was smart
instead of just a steward (whatever that is) they would open it back up just
like it was 1992 all over again.
A whole new crop of ISPs would take part in the Gold Rush.
Until then I will grasp my IPV4 blocks until they pry them from
my cold dead hands.

George Davey, B.S. MCSE
Network Administrator
3200 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA  50312
515.271.1544
FAX 515.271.7063
CELL 515.480.1605
George.Davey at dmu.edu
www.dmu.edu 

From:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Ted
Mittelstaedt
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:02 PM
To: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Effect of ARIN's Letters

The problem is what do your customers want?

As a smaller ISP we can't set policy on the Internet.  We
aren't bringing customers onboard at the
rate of hundreds a day where we can afford to scrape the 2-3
annoying and demanding ones off our
shoes.  We are concerned about losing even a single customer -
it won't break us, but we aren't
complacent about it either.

As long as there's customers on the Internet that can demand and
get routable IPv4 addresses from
our competitors, we will have to offer IPv4.  We don't have
the luxury of a Verizon or a Qwest to be
able to look that customer in the eye and say "NO, and nobody
else is going to give you one either"
and have the customer curse and swear at us but, due to cut-rate
pricing or contracts, other bundling and
marketing stuff that allows us to lock in that customer, be able to
force our will on them.

And before you start saying that these large ISPs can't force
customers to do anything, I see it
happening all the time.  All they have to do is cut their
monthly rate below ours - and it doesn't
take much - and there's a lot of customers out there who will do
whatever they tell them to.  We have
even lost customers to the big guys who ended up paying MORE to the
big guys - but went to them
solely because they got a unified telephone/internet bill from
a single provider, and they had some
accountant 2000 miles away paying the bill who wanted it that way.

SO, we will be more than happy to 'reclaim and share those
crumbs".  It will keep us alive for
a long enough time for the big guys to start playing hardball with
their customers and forcing
them to IPv6.  Once the big guys start telling their customers
NO (or more likely that it will
cost them plenty) to get IPv4, then we will be able to raise prices
or do whatever it takes to make
our customers go to IPv6 as well.

Ted

________________________________

From:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
[mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ
Crepin-Leblond
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:38 AM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Effect of ARIN's Letters

The
good news is that we're discussing this on the ARIN list, rather than debating
policies about IPv4 reclaiming which I personally equate to reclaiming and
sharing of crumbs. Nobody's ever survived on crumbs that size.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090501/382db014/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2167 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090501/382db014/attachment.gif>