[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy (Using the Emergency PDP)

[Martin Hannigan]

Scott,

Thinking out of the box a bit, let me ask you another question. Why
shouldn't we address the entire section in this single review since
the new PDP allows for this and the modification addresses the same
section?

Best,

Martin



On 3/24/09, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> True, but I don't think we should make such changes using the emergency
> PDP unless they're critical.  Since we're essentially in a highly
> abbreviated (almost last-call like) review period for this emergency
> draft policy, I think we're best off focusing on the changes the Board
> made in the emergency policy.
>
> I do think it would be worthwhile to clean up the old M&A transfer
> policy (and others have said so as well, including staff in some of
> their assessments of 2008-2), so I would welcome a policy proposal to do
> so (using the normal PDP).
>
> Do you have any specific opinion on the changes between 2008-6 and
> 2009-1, such as the removal of the 3-year sunset clause?
>
> Thanks for your well-thought out non-circus-act contributions thus far,
> on this and all the other draft policy proposals.
>
> -Scott
>
> Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Scott,
>>
>> This posting says "replace section 8". I think that opens the policy
>> up to feedback on all sections.
>>
>> -M<
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Scott Leibrand
>> <scottleibrand at gmail.com <mailto:scottleibrand at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Martin,
>>
>>     Those sections are already in the NRPM. If you think they need
>>     changed, I think it would be best to make a new proposal to do so.
>>
>>     Do you have any (more) feedback on the changes proposed here?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Scott
>>
>>     On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Martin Hannigan
>>     <martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs <mailto:martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs>>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     My contribution is related to the policy. I reserve my right to
>>>     provide an act for the circus at a later date.
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Member Services <info at arin.net
>>>     <mailto:info at arin.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     [ clip ]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         Number resources are issued, based on justified need, to
>>>         organizations,
>>>         not to individuals representing those organizations.
>>>
>>>
>>>     [..]
>>>
>>>
>>>         Thus, if a company
>>>         goes out of business, regardless of the reason, the point of
>>>         contact
>>>         (POC) listed for the number resource does not have the
>>>         authority to
>>>         sell, transfer, assign, or give the number resource to any
>>>         other person
>>>         or organization. The POC must notify ARIN if a business fails
>>>         so the
>>>         assigned number resources can be returned to the available
>>>         pool of
>>>         number resources if a transfer is not requested and justified.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Stating that the POC has no rights and then requiring them to
>>>     take action on our behalf seems questionable. I don't think we
>>>     can require a POC to do anything.
>>>
>>>     I'd be in favor of this if the work was ARIN's and it was
>>>     effective. "Upon notification of a major negative change in a
>>>     Corporations status" might work and leaving  the door open for
>>>     methods of surveillance to implement this section of the policy
>>>     would be useful, IMHO.
>>>
>>>     The rewrite may read:
>>>
>>>     "Number resources are issued based on justified need to
>>>     organizations and not to individuals that represent those
>>>     organizations. Upon notification that a major negative event
>>>     related to the Corporations solvency [define these in defintions]
>>>     has occurred, ARIN will freeze all assigned  provider independent
>>>     "PI" address space, ASN's, and affiliated resources deemed
>>>     necessary to protect ARIN assigned number resources and their
>>>     disposition. Changes to these resources during the negative event
>>>     will be processed in a manner consistent with ARIN policy and
>>>     agreements in effect at the time of the negative event".
>>>
>>>
>>>     [ clip ]
>>>
>>>     Not in love with the M&A requirements. Too broad in depth and
>>>     breadth. We've been here before so I don't need to repeat.
>>>
>>>     Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>     Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     PPML
>>>     You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>     the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net
>>>     <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>>>     Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>     http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>>     Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you
>>>     experience any issues.
>>
>>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device