[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Customer Confidentiality - revised

[Joe Provo]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:13:02AM -0400, Member Services wrote:
[snip]
> In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on this proposal on
> the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.

I'll go from "non-support" to "actively oppose".  As long as we have 
end-to-end connectivity, we need end-to-end accountability.  If an 
allocation is large enough to be registered, then the entity should 
be known.


-- 
             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE