[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6
kloch at kl.net
Mon Jun 1 19:00:08 EDT 2009
Owen DeLong wrote:
> Let's run some realistic numbers into this "unsustainable growth" we
> keep hearing about...
> There are, currently, about 32000 actively advertised ASNs
> Source: (http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asn16 Figure 11)
> The IPv4 routing table is currently somewhere around 285,000 routes for
> an average of
> nearly 9 routes per prefix. The IPv6 reality is much more likely to be
> closer to 3 routes
> per prefix (in fact, the vast majority of end-user ASNs should be very
> close to 1 prefix
> and the vast majority of ISPs will be reasonably close to that for
> ORIGINating routes,
> but, will advertise prefixes from other end-users, obviously).
There are several factors responsible for the prefixes per ASN being
larger than the "ideal" 1.0 in IPv4:
slow-start RIR policies
mergers and acquisitions
announcement of more specifics (for whatever reason)
The contribution of slow-start RIR policies should be effectively
eliminated by the generous initial assignment sizes in IPv6. The other
two factors will likely exist in IPv6 in similar proportions.
I looked at the list of observed more specifics from this URL:
which contains 240,289 prefixes. That number is much higher than I
expected but yields 7.6 prefixes per ASN.
Thus excluding slow-start and mergers and acquisitions we could
still see 7.6 IPv6 prefixes per ASN if IPv6 were deployed and used to
the extent that IPv4 is.
More information about the ARIN-PPML