[arin-ppml] IPv4 Run Out Proposals

Chris Grundemann cgrundemann at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 17:34:14 EDT 2009


On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 13:31, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote:
>
> David Farmer wrote:
>>
>> I've been meaning to ask this for several weeks now, where has the summer gone?
>>
>> Leo and I are the AC Shepards for the two IPv4 Run Out Proposals, they are;
>>
>> 93. Predicable IPv4 Run Out by Prefix Size http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-June/014635.html
>>
>> 94. Predictable IPv4 Run Out by Allocation Window
>> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-June/014392.html
>>
>> Leo, I, and I believe much of the AC, think that these proposals shouldn't move forward separately, but that one or the other, or a merged version of the two, should move forward to Draft Policy to be discussed at ARIN XXIV in Dearborn.
>>
>> Therefore, Leo and I would like feed back on these two proposals, and your ideas on the following options;
>>
>> 1. Should they be merged together and move forward as a single Draft Policy?
>>
>
> yes.

+1

My recommendation is that proposal 94 is merged into proposal 93,
leaving the fairly arbitrary date based method of reduction behind in
favor of a remaining resources based implementation (and limit it to
IPv4 explicitly); such as "when ARIN receives its last /8, an
organization may choose to request up to a 6 month supply of IPv4
resources" or some more finely graduated but similarly triggered
reduction.

$0.02,
~Chris

>
> Ted
>
>> 2. Should "Predicable IPv4 Run Out by Prefix Size" move forward to Draft Policy alone?
>>
>> 3. Should "Predictable IPv4 Run Out by Allocation Window" move forward to Draft Policy alone?
>>
>> 4. Should they move forward as two separate Draft Policies?
>>
>> 5. Should they both be abandoned?
>> In order to make it on to the agenda for Dearborn, Draft Policy text must be ready for Staff and Legal Review by the end of this week.
>> So please get any suggestions you have in as soon as possible, I'm going to start on a merged version of the text in case the consensus is to go that way, I will share it on PPML in the next day or two.
>>
>> Thank you for your feed back.
>>
>>
>> ===============================================
>> David Farmer                                      Email:farmer at umn.edu
>> Office of Information Technology
>> Networking & Telecomunication Services
>> University of Minnesota                Phone: 612-626-0815
>> 2218 University Ave SE                 Cell: 612-812-9952
>> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029             FAX: 612-626-1818
>> ===============================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



--
Chris Grundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.twitter.com/chrisgrundemann
www.coisoc.org



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list