[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - July 2009

cja@daydream.com packetgrrl at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 17:58:23 EDT 2009


Marty it is not true that nobody cares.  Most of us care a great deal.  The
Author of this proposal feels (ask her.. it's Marla) that the current
practice implemented by ARIN takes care of things then why shouldn't the AC
focus our time and energy on proposals of greater concern?  If you or anyone
else feels that we have made an error than petitiion and the proposal will
be brought to the meeting in Dearborn for consideration.
----Cathy

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Martin Hannigan <
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, cja at daydream.com<packetgrrl at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Marty
> > Feel free to petition but the author of the proposal is the one who
> > interpreted and advocated abandonment.  The intent of the proposal was to
> > extend the timeframe that folks could get 2-byte ASNs.  ARIN's practice
> > regarding how they will hand out ASNs in essence does this without a
> policy.
> >
> > ----Cathy
>
> Why, so the AC can toss it again? If it doesnt say "global" or
> "transition" nobody really cares. It's not cool enough. :-)
>
> -M<
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090722/1afacd4d/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list