[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Protective Usage TransferPolicyforIPv4 Address

Danny McPherson danny at tcb.net
Sat Feb 14 20:03:50 EST 2009


On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:06 PM, David Farmer wrote:
>>
> In the present predicament, in your opinion is a change in
> ARIN policy called for?  If so what?

I believe folks that operate critical infrastructure or
resources should use the framework (CI micro allocations)
that's in place already to preempt concerns in this area,
as doing so in a reactive manner will likely be much more
obtrusive.

-danny



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list