[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria - revised

[Chris Grundemann]

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:25, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Member Services wrote:
<snip>
>> be currently Multihomed (or immediately become Multihomed) and have an
>> ARIN assigned AS number.
>>
> Why would you want to preclude the use of legacy ASNs and/or ASNs issued
> by other registries?

I had not thought of legacy ASNs - perhaps the wording should be
"...and have a validly assigned AS number."?
~Chris

>
> Otherwise, I'm generally OK with the policy, but, would be strongly in favor
> of it at 100 sites rather than 200 as I do know of ISPs that are smaller than
> 200 sites, are not multihomed, but, are legitimate.
>
> Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org