[arin-ppml] The non-deployment of IPv6
Paul G. Timmins
ptimmins at clearrate.com
Wed Dec 9 15:31:36 EST 2009
I have IPv6 though Verizon Business. If you need some contacts, let me
Note that they use GRE tunnels, and they're using some sort of broken
juniper gear with MTU issues.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:48 AM
To: arin ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] The non-deployment of IPv6
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I think that we all really ought to agree that 2010 is the year
> that ISP's stop accepting the "I can't" excuse from their upstreams
> they ask about IPv6 and insist on being told the real truth on why
> the upstream isn't doing it. A transit AS would have to have an
> extremely gnarly backbone that actually "couldn't" run it. I mean,
> stuff that you fish out of the Dumpsters behind the better ISP's can
> IPv6 now.
Believe me, I tried really, really hard with Verizon. When I turned down
my SAVVIS circuit for other reasons, I mentioned that native IPv6 could
have persuaded me to keep it anyway. I keep checking with Sprint from
time to time (hi, Wes) to see if/when I can convert my tunnel to native.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML