[arin-ppml] Does this apply to Transfers too?

[Kevin Kargel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of John Curran
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:14 AM
> To: Michael K.Smith - Adhost
> Cc: ARIN PPML
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Does this apply to Transfers too?
> 
> 
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> >
> > [Michael K. Smith - Adhost]
> >
> > What if the person requesting the block is an Officer in the company?
> > We're small and I'm the CTO/CISO and I do the requests for space.
> > Would
> > I be a valid respondent to the secondary inquiry or is this a matter
> > of
> > vetting through a second, discrete individual?
> 
> Michael -
> 
>    There are additional details are available here:
>    <https://www.arin.net/resources/agreements/officer_attest.html>
>    If that doesn't address your circumstances, send a message to
>    ARIN Registration Services <hostmaster at arin.net> for assistance.
> 
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> Acting CEO
> ARIN
> 
One thing that I do find interesting is that the way it is written ARIN will
initiate the correspondence with the "Officer".  In our registrations the
Admin POC happens to be our COO, who happens to be very aware and educated
and would be able to make this call, but I can see that for a lot of
organizations ARIN will have trouble identifying an appropriate officer,
unless they just ask the Tech POC who they should call to verify his
submission.  

That would be sort of like asking your teenage daughter who you should call
to see if she really was at the library all night, rather a pointless
exercise IMHO.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090421/4f7a1257/attachment.bin>