[arin-ppml] The AC has a job to do with 2009-1, can you please help?

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net 
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of David Farmer
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 12:03 PM
> To: Joe Maimon
> Cc: ARIN PPML
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] The AC has a job to do with 
> 2009-1,can you please help?
> 
> On 6 Apr 2009 Joe Maimon wrote:
> 
> > The more I consider it, the less the idea of a sunset 
> clause appeals.
> > 
> > A policy that works as intended should either obsolete 
> itself or not 
> > require any obsoletion. If it does not work as intended, thats what 
> > the BoT emergency powers are for and a sunset would most 
> likely be too 
> > late to the part anyway.
> 
> So, I personally really don't care one way or another on the 
> sunset clause for a Transfer Policy, I can take it or leave it.
> 
> But lately I've hearing a lot of opposition to have a policy 
> with a sunset clause.  And at least the way it is being 
> presented, it isn't mealy opposition to a sunset clause on a 
> Transfer policy, but a more philosophical opposition to any 
> policy with a sunset clause.
> 

David,

  I'm reading a lot of posts against a sunset clause, too.  But,
they are all from the same small handful of people.  That doesn't
qualify as "a lot of opposition".  In fact, the opposition to
removing the sunset clause seems to be much broader.

Ted