[arin-ppml] Looking at just the pro and con merits of 2009-1review

[Lee Dilkie]

Randy Bush wrote:
>> Our problem in this area is that there are NO upstream providers that
>> route IPv6.
>>     
>
> as a temp, get a tunnel.  that is what most of us did, kinda like
> getting pa before pi.  it's bad, but not as bad as no packets.  if und
> can/will not provision one, i can.  and i assume there are others with
> automated brokers which can be used.
>
> note that at my home here in ntt's home turf i have ntt 100/100 f/etth,
> and have to tunnel ipv6 to iij.  ntt does not offer it, except on ppt.
> talk is cheap.
>
> and as i tried to do, document what you do, so the next bozo on the bus
> has a leg up.
>
> randy
>
>   
Randy,

Have you had good luck with tunnels? I've have ipv6 for a couple of
years now, I'm on my third tunnel broker, and I have to say... I love
ipv6 (and hate it too for some things), but I hate the reliability I've
had with tunnel brokers. Lots of times my tunnel is up but ipv6 isn't
being routed correctly )usually broken somewhere in the brokers
networks). I really wish I had an ISP that offered native but alas, none
to be found around here.

-lee