[arin-ppml] Looking at just the pro and con merits of 2009-1review

[Sweeting, John]

Thanks Bill, good input on the first two items. Realizing that 2008-6 has already been adopted by the Board based on the AC recommendation based on community consensus the last point is moot as far as 2009-1 since it already exists. On the 3rd point I just want to point out that we are still in the discussion stage and the Board is following current process, this is not an endorsement but merely an observation. 

________________________________

From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net on behalf of William Herrin
Sent: Thu 4/2/2009 6:45 PM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Looking at just the pro and con merits of 2009-1review



On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Azinger, Marla
<marla.azinger at frontiercorp.com> wrote:
> Sunset Clause (was taken out of 2009-1)
> Pro: Sets a hard date to stop transfers and resume original policy.

Pro: The policy expires unless there is fresh consensus to continue it.

A policy establishing an address market is well out in front of
anything we've done before. The odds of getting it right the first
time are effectively nil. The sunset date assures up front that the
mistakes we make here won't propagate indefinitely.


> New Definition "Organization.  An Organization is one or more legal entities
> under common control or ownership."
> Con: Large segmented organizations will have to face management of address

Con: Unenforceable. Ownership or control of legal entities is not
necessarily a matter of public record.

Con: Changes over time. Why should I be thrown into noncompliance just
because Buffet chose to buy a controlling stake both in my company and
in Verizon?



Use of the Emergency PDP process for a questionable definition of emergency.

Con: Sets a precedent for the misuse of the emergency PDP process.


Explicit disaggreation permission.

Con: encourages a BGP table explosion. While I personally think the
consequences of a BGP table explosion are overrated (the hardware
capability, at the moment, is very comfortable ahead of demand)

Or has that changed? 'Cause if we're no longer worried about the BGP
table, I'll happily submit a proposal extending the prefix length from
/22 to /24.


I reiterate that I adamantly OPPOSE proposal 2009-1.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



P Go Green! Print this email only when necessary. Thank you for helping Time Warner Cable be environmentally responsible.
 
 
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any
copy of this E-mail and any printout.