[arin-ppml] Looking at just the pro and con merits of 2009-1 review

[Kevin Kargel]

________________________________________
>>From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Durand, Alain
>>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:08 PM
>>To: Azinger, Marla; arin-ppml at arin.net
>>Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Looking at just the pro and con merits of 2009-1
review

>>Here is my $.02, speaking as an individual.

>>Sunset clause:
>>I like the idea of a sunset clause as a forcing function to review this
policy. This seems to be a good thing to do, especially given the
controversial nature of this >>policy.

>>Implementation date:
>>Who, beside spammer, speculators & anybody who does not meet the ARIN
public policies would want to use paying transfer as long as there are
addresses available?
>>It seems to me that the community should delay the implementation of this
policy until the chocking point and use that time to clean-up whois
records...
>>At least it would lower the noise on questionable originator of transfers.

>>v4/v6
>>I’d like to see this policy explicitly restricted to IPv4. In the case the
world really embrace IPv6, at east we would have maintained somehow a more
sensible world >>there.

>>   - Alain.


If you do not think 2009-1 is a sensible proposal then please do not support
it.  If it won't work for IPv6 then don't do it for IPv4 either.

Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090402/cd6fde40/attachment.bin>