[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS POC?s

[Kevin Kargel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Leo Bicknell
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS POC?s
> 
> In a message written on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:54:22PM -0400, William
> Herrin wrote:
> > 1. Don't ping POCs for which at least one attached resource has been
> > updated in the past 3 to 5 years. If some other behavior demonstrates
> > a high probability that the POC is valid, there's no need to burn more
> > of the POC's time.
> >
> > 2. Don't ping POCs which have been updated or have responded to this
> > or another query within the past 3 years.
> 
> I think "3 to 5 years" is too long, but I would absolutely agree
> that if ARIN has interacted with the POC via e-mail in the past
> year there is no reason to re-ping the POC.
> 
> --
>        Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>         PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

I would agree that 1 year would be reasonable, and that any activity from a
POC should trigger "valid" status.  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090402/0487dd14/attachment.bin>