[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS POC?s

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:54:22PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
> 1. Don't ping POCs for which at least one attached resource has been
> updated in the past 3 to 5 years. If some other behavior demonstrates
> a high probability that the POC is valid, there's no need to burn more
> of the POC's time.
> 
> 2. Don't ping POCs which have been updated or have responded to this
> or another query within the past 3 years.

I think "3 to 5 years" is too long, but I would absolutely agree
that if ARIN has interacted with the POC via e-mail in the past
year there is no reason to re-ping the POC.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090402/43677591/attachment.sig>