[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2:IPv4Transfer Policy Proposal -Revised

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Fri Sep 19 12:23:41 EDT 2008

On Sep 19, 2008, at 5:49 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:

>> The answer is just to state that "physical addresses for all
>> registrant parties for all registrations, requests and/or
>> transfers must be in the 'ARIN Service Area' " then define
>> the ARIN service area..
> That is not the intent.
> The intent is for the policy to only enable transfer of blocks
> for which ARIN is RESPONSIBLE, i.e. blocks which the IANA allocated
> to ARIN or which were transferred to ARIN under the ERX process.
> This has nothing to do with where the addresses are used or where
> the organization is located.
> Some global networks get all their addresses from one registry.
> Other global networks get addresses from all 5 registries depending
> on which continent their network infrastructure is located. Both
> kinds of networks are doing the right thing.

The intent does, however, include the desire to exclude organizations
which have no operations within the ARIN service region from being
transferees just as they are ineligible to receive resources from ARIN


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080919/fb789695/attachment.p7s>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list