[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer PolicyProposal -Revised

[Owen DeLong]

You are ignoring the context of the verbiage.

This verbiage strictly applies to what IP resources will be processed
in transfer transactions by ARIN if 2008-2 is adopted.

As such, it makes sense to specify that 2008-2 only applies
to resources which are administered by ARIN and where the
transferee would be eligible to receive their resources from
ARIN as a result of residing or operating a network within the
ARIN service region.

That is, I believe, the intent of the verbiage that sparked this
controversy.

Owen

On Sep 18, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Kevin Kargel wrote:

> What actions are we going to take regarding ARIN registered IP space  
> that is
> being used on a host or network geographically located outside of  
> "ARIN
> service area"?
>
> Are you saying that if "International Widgit Import Company" out of
> Winnipeg, Manitoba,Canada gets an IP block that they cannot use a  
> subnet of
> that network at their office in Hong Kong?  If so what are we going  
> to do to
> police that?
>
> The same questions apply to Mitsuyama Ball Bearing Co. who registers a
> network using their Grafton, Iowa, USA address and then implements  
> them at
> their Tokyo, Japan plant..
>
> If the answer to what we are going to do is "Nothing" then the verbage
> itself is superfluous..
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
>> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Chris Grundemann
>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:54 AM
>> To: Scott Leibrand
>> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4
>> Transfer PolicyProposal -Revised
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Scott Leibrand
>> <sleibrand at internap.com> wrote:
>>> michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>>>>> * The IPv4 block must currently be registered for use within the
>>>>> ARIN service area.
>>>>
>>>> What does this mean?
>>>
>>> The intent there is that it simply has to be ARIN space.
>> We're open
>>> to suggestions for improved wording.
>>>
>> A quick stab at it:
>> // The IPv4 block must currently be registered with ARIN or
>> be recognized legacy space within the ARIN service area. //
>> IMHO that wording may avoid misconceptions / perceptions
>> about (new) geographic limitations.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Grundemann
>> www.linkedin.com/in/cgrundemann
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.