[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy

[Scott Leibrand]

Ok, thanks.  I think we'll go ahead and put the legacy language back in to 
avoid any confusion or misconceptions.

-Scott

Cliff Bedore wrote:
> I like what Chris says below regarding this item.
> 
> Cliff
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com> wrote:
>>> michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>>>>> * The IPv4 block must currently be registered for use within
>>>>> the ARIN service area.
>>>> What does this mean?
>>> The intent there is that it simply has to be ARIN space.  We're open to
>>> suggestions for improved wording.
>>>
>> A quick stab at it:
>> // The IPv4 block must currently be registered with ARIN or be
>> recognized legacy space within the ARIN service area. //
>> IMHO that wording may avoid misconceptions / perceptions about (new)
>> geographic limitations.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Chris Grundemann
>> www.linkedin.com/in/cgrundemann
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> 
>