[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal -Revised

[Chris Grundemann]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com> wrote:
> michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>>> * The IPv4 block must currently be registered for use within
>>> the ARIN service area.
>>
>> What does this mean?
>
> The intent there is that it simply has to be ARIN space.  We're open to
> suggestions for improved wording.
>
A quick stab at it:
// The IPv4 block must currently be registered with ARIN or be
recognized legacy space within the ARIN service area. //
IMHO that wording may avoid misconceptions / perceptions about (new)
geographic limitations.



-- 
Chris Grundemann
www.linkedin.com/in/cgrundemann