[arin-ppml] the Transfer Policy Argument Space

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:04:33PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> On 3 Sep 2008 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > 
> > David,
> > 
> >  how about lets leave IPv6 (mostly) out of the discussion?
> 
> IPv6 has been a big part of the arguments I've seen, so I'm not sure I've will 
> to eliminate it from the argument space, but I'm more that happy to have 
> IPv4 only argumnets in the argument space.  And I like this one, are there 
> more?
> 
> > ) IPv4 will continue to be used/useful for the next N years
> > (N==10-20). 
> > 
> > ) Demand for IPv4 has outstripped supply.
> > 
> > ) Until viable alternatives become available, the trend will be to
> > find 
> >   more efficent ways to use the IPv4 pool.
> > 
> > 
> > --bill

	actually, if you can live with these lemas, then the crux of the 
	arguements boil down to two items (from the last lema), e.g.

	) what are the viable alternatives?

	) what are the "more efficent" ways to use the pool?


a transfer policy is a/one way to gain efficent use of the pool.

--bill