[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-4 - a consensus opinion?
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Oct 10 01:08:37 EDT 2008
On 10 Oct 2008 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:32:39PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> > > Let's have a minimum allocation boundary that works for everybody in
> > > the ARIN region (or better yet all RIRs) and be done with this.
> > This is like saying that there should be one and only one global set of Zoning
> > laws. And, I don't believe in a one size fits all world.
> well, not to toss cold H2O on the fire, but routing is either
> bilateral or global in scope... if one takes the view that
> minalloc size affects global routing, then one-size does fit
> the whole world...
Bill if you say so, then the magic number is /29, see the following looking at
193/8 and 194/7;
I've been digging in and looking at stuff, I didn't realize any RIR were or did
> that said, perhaps it is time to re-animate -MICRO-ALLOCATION GRRL- (tm)
> and argue that the correct minium allocation for now should be
> a /32, regardless of address family.
> Cathy, are you up for it?
David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
Networking & Telecomunication Services
University of Minnesota Phone: 612-626-0815
2218 University Ave SE Cell: 612-812-9952
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 FAX: 612-626-1818
More information about the ARIN-PPML