[ppml] Policy to help the little guys

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:11:26PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> i was presuming the use of a well known /16 would be so that isps could
> allow the long prefixes in that space.  as it would be the same number
> of prefixes if we gave them /24s, what's the loss?
> 
> btw, i remember an arin meeting in denver when cja tore my head off and
> bad mouthed me behind my back for proposing /24s.  so watch out!

	cja -is- the micro-allocation grrl.
	/29's should not be a problem for her, neither should /30's
	or even /32's.   But I suspect no one, other than Kim or 
	yourself is ever going to get a /33 out of IPv4 space again.

	cja?

--bill

> 
> randy
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.