[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed Mar 5 23:28:53 EST 2008
>On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:29:23PM -0800, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> > David Conrad wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > I have a couple more fundamental questions:
> >
> > a) What is the overarching goal the transfer policy is trying to achieve?
>
> If there were just one goal, this would be easy. We're trying to ensure
> the continued availability of IP resources after IPv4 free pool
> exhaustion, minimizing disruption, minimizing unnecessary deaggregation,
> preserving some level of fairness, etc...
Scott:
er... thats a list of goals :)
how about... "maintaining the stewardship role for IP space".
> > b) What tools exist (or can be expected to exist given reasonable
> > time/resources) to enforce that policy?
David:
are you refering to the proposed policy in the ARIN region
on transfers?
if so, whats wrong with the existing tools?
> > A couple of observations:
> >
> FYI, we'll be posting version 1.1 of this policy shortly, which IMO
> includes some improvements on this front.
this is useful and productive dialog, helping to refine
the proposal. thanks.
--bill
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list