[arin-ppml] Q1 - ARIN address transfer policy: whythetriggerdate?
jcurran at istaff.org
Wed Jun 25 08:35:53 EDT 2008
At 1:04 PM +0100 6/25/08, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
> > What would that look like?
>It would not look like lobbying or promotion.
>One thing that is within ARIN's scope would be to operate a public
>issue-tracking system for IPv6. This would allow anyone to raise an
>issue that is making it impossible or hard to deploy IPv6. The tracker
>would allow reporting of progress towards a solution and also help to
>collect information that will be useful to deployers. Some of the issues
>will name names, i.e. vendor X's box fails to properly handle situation
>Y or Windows Vista does not do DNS queries over IPv6. It would have to
>be moderated so that all issues are factual and clearly stated.
Presently we're swimming in web sites full of IPv6 deployment advice:
To quoteth Randy: "there seem to be more folk working on v6 wikis than
vendors working on fully functional v6/dual-stack implementations."
If there is a need for ARIN to do more in this space, then let's discuss it,
but I do think it's important to consider what other initiatives are already
More information about the ARIN-PPML