[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-16: Ipv4 Soft Landing - a simulation analysis
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Wed Jan 30 23:13:56 EST 2008
Geoff,
Thanks very much!
On Jan 30, 2008, at 7:11 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
> Taking the values for 0.85 and 0.90 and plugging them in to the
> projection model as per the policy proposal results in the following:
>
> IANA exhaustion date: 8 July 2011 (was 1 June 2011)
>
> First RIR to exhaust its unallocated address pool: 17 October 2012
> (was
> 8 August 2012)
Based on your assumptions and analysis, it would seem the change in
allocation criteria wouldn't have sufficient impact to make the effort
worthwhile.
> Like all simulations there are a lot of assumptions at play here,
Indeed, and the back of the envelope results I obtained (oh so long
ago) were somewhat different, but I trust your numbers more than mine
(:-)).
So, the question is, whether I should
a) revise 2007-16 to remove the change in allocation criteria but keep
the requirements for documentation of transition plans (etc.)
b) abandon 2007-16 as a bad idea
c) do more simulation studies to see how different the answers might
be given different assumptions
What do people think?
Thanks,
-drc
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list