[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Per Heldal wrote:
> The suggested policy also seems to be in conflict with the RIR principle
> of not being involved in routing. Wherever there's money to be made

I don't believe there is any such RIR principle.

All of the RIR's take a lot of input from those who do routing.
Many of the allocation policies were written by those familar with
routing in an effort to lead to an efficient, stable routing system.

What the RIR's have said repeatedly is that they cannot guarantee
routeability.  No RIR can promise that some ISP will get your route
in a table somewhere.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080212/5c11af1e/attachment.sig>