[ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal

[Bill Darte]

I wish that a global strategy were more understandable and within reach.

What are we talking about....global strategy to what?

The problem (a problem) is more localized than the RIR.  Need and
acquistion of address space (of whatever type) is localized within the
requestor.... The RIR and global mission is to make fair and relatively
inexpensive allocations and assignments of those resources.

That strategy could be to try and force organizations to request 1 type
of resource vs another or to encourage it or to, whatever.

Please define the need against which a global strategy may be applied
and how does it differ what appears to be similar policy proposals
emerging from RIRs?

Bill Darte
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Raul Echeberria
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:11 AM
> To: Ray Plzak; Randy Bush
> Cc: ppml at arin.net; sig-policy at apnic.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 
> Transfer Policy Proposal
> 
> 
> Ray
> 
> My point is that we first need a global strategy and later 
> probably global and/or coordinated policies for implementing 
> that strategy.
> And of course, I agree with you regarding commitments, and 
> rest that you said.
> 
> Raul
> 
> 
> At 09:45 a.m. 12/02/2008, Ray Plzak wrote:
> >Merely pointing out that there are implications to the use 
> of the term 
> >globally coordinated policy, a term that has been used many 
> times over 
> >the past several months, perhaps a little to glibly.
> >
> >Even a global and coordinated strategy will require 
> commitments, once 
> >made, must not be subject to disassembly by the subsequent 
> actions of a 
> >single RIR. Once that happens the global and coordinated strategy is 
> >neither global or coordinated. Think locally while acting 
> globally is 
> >more than just a catchy phrase.
> >
> >Ray
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:38 AM
> > > To: Raul Echeberria
> > > Cc: Ray Plzak; ppml at arin.net; sig-policy at apnic.net
> > > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer 
> > > Policy Proposal
> > >
> > > > I am not necessarily claiming for a global or a 
> coordinated policy 
> > > > (maybe yes), but for a global "and" coordinated strategy for 
> > > > dealing with a global problem.
> > >
> > > too radical.  it is our right to think locally while 
> acting globally.
> > > that's why there are five rirs, right?
> > >
> > > randy
> >
> >*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management 
> >policy           *
> >_______________________________________________
> >sig-policy mailing list
> >sig-policy at lists.apnic.net
> >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1273 - Release Date: 
> >12/02/2008 09:31 a.m.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to 
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at 
> info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>