[ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."

[John Curran]

At 7:11 PM +0000 2/9/08, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
>	right model, but (imho) 180 degrees out of phase.
>	think IPv6 only islands w/ a thin veneer of IPv4
>	(say a /28) on the outside.  the ALG's to support
>	this are not well defined, with the IETF reconsidering
>	work in this area.  some call this NAT-PT, my favorite
>	is the CERN-IVI box... which might see the light of
>	day 3q08...

Bill -

Is it safe to presume that these are architectures proposed for
new customer connections?  It is hard to imagine an existing
Internet connected (via IPv4) site having any reason to evolve
its internal network into an IPv6 island intentionally in the near
future...

/John