[ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Apr 7 23:07:23 EDT 2008


On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:08:29AM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
> Tom Vest wrote:
> > "Address Ownership Considered Fatal"
> > Yakhov Rekter
> > March 31, 1995
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/95apr/area.and.wg.reports/ops/cidrd/cidrd.rekhter.slides.ps
> 
> ... as far as I can see both RFC1744 and the Rekhter document both are supportive of a lease concept (Corollary 3, page 12 of the Rekhter presentation, RFC1744, section 3, para 4).
> 
> thanks,
> 
>    Geoff

	that would be two points of view - neither of which seemed to 
	make it into RFC 2050.  UNLESS you consider the concept of a lease
	as a narrowly focused, specific business plan implementation of
	a larger, more broadly scoped concept of bounded stewardship.

--bill



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list