[ppml] Revision to 2008-3
owen at delong.com
Thu Apr 3 00:01:34 EDT 2008
I don't think incorporation should be required, but, some set of
which embody the idea that the organization is structured for the
the community and has non-exclusive membership based control of the
organization should be part of the policy in my opinion.
On Apr 3, 2008, at 10:52 AM, David Farmer wrote:
> I know a lot are not incorporated, hence the scenarios I brought up
> in earlier
> emails. In Seattle's instance who signes any contracts, like lets
> say a an
> ARIN RSA for instance. I was thinking another community based non-
> that is incorporated could and maybe should take that role on behalf
> of the
> Community Network. I could maybe see an individual could do it.
> But, I'm
> not sure I like the idea fo a for-profit company taking on that role.
> Do you have other ideas on how to deal with the issue? Or am I
> being just
> too midwestern about this kind of thing.
> On 3 Apr 2008 Randy Bush wrote:
>> many community networks are not incorporated. e.g. seattle wireless,
>> maybe one of the oldest free wirless communities is not incorporated.
> David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota Phone: 612-626-0815
> 2218 University Ave SE Cell: 612-812-9952
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 FAX: 612-626-1818
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the
> ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net
> if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML