[ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy

Kevin Kargel kkargel at polartel.com
Wed Sep 12 16:58:27 EDT 2007

They could do that now and there policies in place to deal with it.
Isn't this why you have recursion policies in your name servers?

If ARIN (or any other agency)listed a foreign domain or netblock as
authoritative on my name servers effectively that domain would be broken
as my name servers would not provide meaningful responces.  I am sure
the domain owner would get it fixed straight away.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Michael Sinatra
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 3:04 PM
> To: davids at webmaster.com
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse 
> Mapping Policy
> David Schwartz wrote:
> > To those people who say ARIN has no business policing this, 
> I ask you this:
> > Suppose some company starting listing your nameservers as 
> secondaries 
> > for all of their blocks. Would you want ARIN to be powerless to do 
> > anything when it's ARIN's delegation to your nameserver's 
> that's hurting you?
> I believe the current policy deals with this situation.  Once 
> the policy went into place, I was able to deal with exactly 
> this issue (with some escalation on my part).
> michael
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to 
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact 
> the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you 
> experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list