[ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
dlw+arin at tellme.com
Mon Jun 18 15:26:37 EDT 2007
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:32:47AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> Is it just me or is there appears to be a disconnect here:
> - On the one hand, we're told that routers can today handle an order
> of magnitude more "routing slots" and over the long term, can handle
> oodles more and that the RIRs don't do "routability".
There's two pieces here that are interesting. There's sufficient raw
copmuting power and space to hold a complete 10M-route table, which I
do believe routers are likely to have "soon". The other piece is more
dynamic - you need to have some way to send/receive full table updates
in a timely fashion, and process them to convergence before the next
set of large disturbances to your local table.
Given the way BGP works, I think the latter is unlikely to be an
operable possibility at 10M-routes. For my org, all failures would be
handled in ~100ms. BGP presently takes minutes to converge. Changing
that to 10s of minutes (while additional updates continue to show up)
is just not a workable solution.
The number of routing slots really is important, regrettably. That
whole loc/id split thing will need to get solved, somehow. I know I'm
really not looking forward to the BGP replacement period. I suspect it
will be at least as painful as the IPv4 -> IPv6 transition. I simply
don't think the current combination of BGP and IP is going to scale
in the way that some folks claim. I could be wrong, but....
More information about the ARIN-PPML