[ppml] Motivating migration to IPv6
Craig Finseth
craig.finseth at state.mn.us
Tue Jul 31 15:15:40 EDT 2007
This is one of the more intelligent proposals that I have seen on this
list lately...
I'm sure the following idea has to have occured to better minds than mine,
but I _cannot_ see what the downside to it is --
...
Proposed:
A) every IPv4 block assignment includes the assignment of an 'equivalent-
size' IPv6 address block ( e.g. assuming '1 IPv4 /32' == '1 IPv6 /64)
B) _subsequent_ v4 requests must show the required utilization levels of
*both* the allocated IPv4 *and* IPv6 space. With "utilization" of IPv6
space requiring the actual deployment of functional machines in that
address-space.
C) As the pool of available IPv4 addresses gets smaller, the ratio of the
relative size of the IPv6 allocation vs the IPv4 allocation _increases_.
...
Craig A. Finseth craig.finseth at state.mn.us
Systems Architect +1 651 201 1011 desk
State of Minnesota, Office of Enterprise Technology
658 Cedar Ave +1 651 297 5368 fax
St Paul MN 55155 +1 651 297 1111 NOC, for reporting problems
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list