[ppml] PIv6 for legacy holders (/w RSA + efficient use)

[Scott Leibrand]

David Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 05:43:00PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
>   
>> Conclusion: For IPv6 to become useful to any part of the community,
>> organizations who DO NOT need additional IPv4 addresses must deploy
>> IPv6.
>>     
>
> Observation: most of those organizations see that transition as an
> expense with no clear ROI.  Why would they be even vaguely interested?
> Personally, I suspect many of those organizations won't be interested
> in the transition until something actually breaks.
>
> I think Leo was right.  We're stuck with the Prisoner's Dilemma.
>   

Perhaps so.  But, should we be encouraging or discouraging such 
organizations to adopt IPv6? I believe we need to do what we can to 
reduce the obstacles to IPv6 adoption, so that far-sighted 
organizations, and those for whom there is an ROI, can more easily adopt 
IPv6.

-Scott