[ppml] PIv6 for legacy holders (/w RSA + efficient use)

[Scott Leibrand]

Randy Bush wrote:

[James Hess]
>> Having policy provide options like this doesn't hurt, but not likely 
>> to make such legacy assignees suddenly have any reason  to migrate,
>> unless they already want V6 space it's not a carrot for them.
>>     
>
> and it is our job to use policy to 'make' anyone migrate why?
>
> randy

I don't think we can or should "make" anyone migrate to IPv6, but I 
think we should reduce or eliminate barriers to doing so where prudent.

Would you support a PIv6 for legacy holders (/w RSA + efficient use) 
policy proposal?

Thanks,
Scott