[ppml] Policy Proposal: Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space

[William Herrin]

Hi Roque,

A predictable final allocation at the endgame seems reasonable.

What are the current rates of consumption for each RIR? What is the
size of the connected, partially connected and unconnected populations
they serve?

Is the scope of each RIR's community well balanced with the other
RIRs? If not, I wonder if assigning them each the same final number of
/8's can be considered egalitarian. I suppose that question could be
mooted by setting N=1 though that would weaken the proposal in other
ways.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


On 7/23/07, Roque Gagliano <rgaglian at antel.net.uy> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it is state in the policy: The number N is defined as: 5.
>
> That is what is been proposed and has been approved at LACNIC meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Roque

-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004