[ppml] Incentive to legacy address holders
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Jul 12 17:20:32 EDT 2007
On 12 Jul 2007, at 14:10, Scott Leibrand wrote:
[...]
> Some splitting is the result of RIR allocation practices, but that
> may not be apparent just from looking at the announcements. For
> example, ARIN gives us about a /17 at a time, and we have to split
> that up and allocate it, usually as /20's, to our various ASNs. If
> we didn't have to do the IPv4 justification thing, we could have a
> single aggregate (/16 or so) for each ASN. In IPv6, we'll be able
> to split our /32 up into one subnet per ASN.
It sounds like you're using the word "practices" as a synonym for
"policy". Presumably ARIN only allocate /17s if that's what you need
for the next six months because that's the policy (4.2.4.4) the
community gave them.
Regards,
Leo
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list