[ppml] IPv6 incentive policy
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Wed Aug 22 00:31:15 EDT 2007
The recent discussion of IPv4 rationing got me to thinking, and,
somehow,
this is the conclusion I came to. I will point out that item 9 is
probably the
most significant information in the template.
Template: ARIN-POLICY-PROPOSAL-TEMPLATE-1.0
1. Policy Proposal Name: IPV6 incentive through IPv4 processing delays
2. Author
a. name: Owen DeLong
b. email: owen at delong.com
c. telephone: 408-921-6984
d. organization: DELONG
3. Proposal Version: 1.0
4. Submission Date: August 21, 2007
5. Proposal type: new
new, modify, or delete.
6. Policy term: temporary
temporary, permanent, or renewable.
7. Policy statement:
In order to encourage organizations to use IPv6 rather than IPv4, ARIN
will introduce a delay in processing new IPv4 applications which is
computed such that D=C/F where D is the number of delays which
ARIN will wait to process the IPv4 template, C is the number of IP
addresses currently in use by the applicant, and, F is the number of
IP addresses currently in the IPv4 free pool (computed as the sum of
the IP addresses in the ARIN free pool and the addresses remaining
in the IANA free pool).
ARIN may completely process the IPv4 template and reserve the
addresses, collect fees, etc. immediately upon receiving the template
using it's normal process. However, a delay shall be introduced
which shall start on the date of the final data submission by the
applicant prior to approval, and, which shall extend D days such
that the value of D is computed as defined in the preceding
paragraph. If the value of D is computed to anything less than
one, then, it shall be treated as if the value was 1.
IPv6 templates shall be processed immediately without any delay.
This policy shall expire when the IPv4 free pool becomes double
the size of the IPv4 free pool as of April 1, 2008.
8. Rationale:
Apparently, some people feel that running out of free IPv4 addresses
will be bad. This proposal provides a self-regulating mechanism
for delaying that date by gradually increasing the time it takes to
receive a new allocation or assignment from ARIN as the free
pool shrinks.
The fewer free addresses there are, the longer it will take to
receive an assignment or allocation. Further, it has the additional
advantage that it will provide faster allocations and assignments
to those organizations which have smaller existing IP resource
pools from which to draw while extending the delay factor for
those few organizations which are already consuming the vast
majority of IP address resources.
9. Timetable for implementation: April 1, 2008
10. Meeting presenter: Ruben Garret L. Goldberg
END OF TEMPLATE
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list