[ppml] Motivating migration to IPv6

[Kirk Ismay]

David E. Smith wrote:
> Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
>   
>> My proposal that orgs pay either their v4 fees or v6 fees, whichever is 
>> more, has the same long-term effect without the unintended consequences.
>>     
>
> Now this is a proposal I can get behind. :)
>
> I work for a fairly small ISP (we've got a single /19). I've been 
> following this discussion, and I've wanted to play with IPv6 for a 
> while. I can't, however, cost-justify it to the boss.
>   
I support this proposal, for the same reasons. We've got an IPv4 /20 and 
we're a fairly small shop also.
I'd like to play with IPv6, if I could only find the time. ;)

Sincerely, Kirk Ismay
System Administrator

-- 
Net Idea
201-625 Front Street Nelson, BC V1L 4B6
P:250-352-3512 | F:250-352-9780 | TF:1-888-352-3512

Check out our brand new website! www.netidea.com